Showing posts with label science fiction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label science fiction. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 1, 2011

The Adjustment Bureau (2011)

The Adjustment Bureau (2011)
Director: George Nolfi
Screenplay: George Nolfi
Starring: Matt Damon, Emily Blunt, Anthony Mackie, John Slattery, Terence Stamp

One-sentence summary: David Norris meets Elise Sellas and they feel an irresistable attraction to each other but higher powers intervene and try to keep them apart despite how "right" their budding romance feels to them.

Review: I think most of us would agree that we'd like to think our presence here means something. Whether it be to change the world or simply keep it running, we want our lives to have meaning. Some believe that our path in life is predetermined, some believe that it's entirely up to us to make our way in the world.

The Adjustment Bureau thinks we can have the best of both worlds.

The basic idea of The Adjustment Bureau is that there is the titular Adjustment Bureau that makes sure people don't deviate from the plans outlined for them by the "Chairman." They tail these individuals and, if necessary, course-correct in case any deviations occur. The main conflict of the film arises when David (Matt Damon) discovers that he was always meant to be with Elise (Emily Blunt) but then his plan changed; she was no longer a part of it. Despite that, the pull he feels towards her causes him to do whatever necessary to ensure that they can have a future together.

Matt Damon and Emily Blunt really sell you on the idea that David and Elise belong together. There's this cute chemistry when they're together that is a lot like the kind of chemistry you'd see in a good comedy movie, and it's not necessarily romantic chemistry from every angle. David and Elise are genuinely good together, even if you can't explain in concrete terms why. They just... work. It's been my experience that the really good relationships aren't always explainable. I had no problem accepting their romance.

The main reason I love the movie, however, is not because of Matt Damon and Emily Blunt (though it was hard not to be entertained when they had their cutesy moments together). It's its worldview. The movie posits the idea that from birth, everyone is set on a very specific path. Maybe it changes along the way, maybe it doesn't. Because of this path, you're given certain skills, abilities, and opportunities to ensure that you'll be successful in your endeavors. However, you still have the freedom to choose what to do with everything you've been given. We were given free will, and therefore we have the ability to exercise it. Will we follow what seems to be our preordained path, or will we forge a new path, possibly at the risk of losing what could be a very successful future?

Or is free will just an illusion and we were always meant to make the decision to deviate? Is the deviation a part of our path?

I leave it to you to answer these questions on your own.

And that's why I love the movie.

Final word: The Adjustment Bureau is an excellent film that makes you really think, and if that doesn't interest you, at least see it for the chance to see Matt Damon and Emily Blunt be really cute together.

Sunday, October 30, 2011

In Time (2011)

In Time (2011)
Director: Andrew Niccol
Screenplay: Andrew Niccol
Starring: Justin Timberlake, Amanda Seyfried, Cillian Murphy, Vincent Kartheiser, Alex Pettyfer, Matt Bomer, Olivia Wilde

One-sentence summary: In a world where time is currency, Will Salas is given a century's worth of time and soon discovers the sinister truth behind the "economic" inequality between his life in the ghetto and those at the top who have accumulated millennia, making them virtually immortal.

Review: I find that I'm attracted most to science fiction that is able to use some kind of concept to shine a light on society. Dollhouse is an excellent example (though it's a TV series and not a movie, but it's an excellent TV series nonetheless). Sometimes it's really easy to let the concept overrun the point the story is trying to make, and I'm happy to say that In Time is not one of those films.

The basic concept of the universe In Time is set in is that everyone stops physically aging at the age of 25 and then a biological clock is switched on that lets them know how much time they have left before they die. Time is currency in the film; you work for it, you spend it. Those at the top of the "economic" ladder have hundreds, if not thousands of years. Those who live in the ghetto live day to day, constantly in danger of timing out. It costs time to travel between "time zones," ensuring that it's difficult for the average layperson to move up economically.

I'm sure by now you realize how socially relevant the movie is right now. Three words: Occupy Wall Street.

It's pretty crazy how perfectly timed (no pun intended) the movie's release was. A happy accident, I'm sure. I'm curious to see how many people pick up on the movie's idea that everyone deserves a chance to live the "American dream" and that those at the top are unfairly keeping all their time to themselves. It's insane to see Phillippe Weis (Vincent Kartheiser) have over nine millennia on him when Will Salas (Justin Timberlake) was lucky to even have 24 hours. Of course, this leads into the movie's Robin Hood-like plot when Will and Sylvia (Amanda Seyfried) decide to steal time to distribute to everyone in the ghetto.

If there was maybe one criticism I had to say about the movie, it's that it's so packed full of scenes and ideas that it feels much longer than its 109 minutes. Really, I think it's worth it. If you're the thinking type, you're going to leave the theater with a fresh perspective on current events.

Okay, and maybe the movie's concept was an excuse to cast all pretty people, but overlook that!

Final word: In Time is a smart, relevant take on economic inequality that perhaps surprisingly turns out to be a futuristic spin on Robin Hood.